This video puts all the visual evidence together. R and L are his parents.evenwind wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 3:07 pmHer feet! We've never seen a close-up of her feet! Maybe Dany and Jon (and Tyrion and Meera?) have "Targaryan Toe"?
It may seem obvious but it's not proof. For all we actually know, Arthur Dayne is Jon's father. But, assuming Jon's father is actually Rhaegar, they really should make it incontrovertable and not just heresay - not only for the viewers but for the characters.Grandmaester Flash wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 10:36 amAs an eye witness, he knows that Ned brought a baby away from the Tower of Joy, and that the baby was Lyanna's.
It was obvious from the circumstances whose baby it was.
And as you go on to say, Ned may have confided more details to him.
https://youtu.be/3xaspBsfgRg
I'm usually hesitant to speak definitively, but I believe this is incontrovertible at this point. Also, the ITEs for S6 include thr Ds discussing how their educated guess of who Jon's parents are is how they passed GRRMz test for getting the rights.
...The Bran choice to go to the Reeds makes the most sense for introducing Howland. Maybe we'll see him bc he has an item, like the sword Dawn, to give to Bran or whoever. But info wise, Bran has everything he needs.
I don't think we need proof of Jon being the heir necessarily, he just became king as a bastard. But it could be useful in future plots. Bran needs only prove his validity as a definitive source, and then he becomes proof of anything.
P.S. humans believe the News and Bran is def more reliable lol. Plus, Westeros basically functions in word of mouth and inductive reasoning.